Skip to main content

China HS → US HTS

China HS 8475.2911 (连续式玻璃热弯炉): US HTS candidates & duty rates

China tariff line for "连续式玻璃热弯炉" shares the international HS6 anchor 847529 with 1 US HTS candidate below. Compare descriptions, then calculate landed duty.

Updated

Quick answer

China HS 8475.2911 most commonly maps to US HTS 8475.29.00.00. Total duty rate from China (MFN + Chapter 99 overlays): about 50%. Verify the description before filing.

China tariff line facts

China HS line8475.2911
Description连续式玻璃热弯炉
Category path白炽灯泡、灯管、放电灯管、电 > 玻璃或玻璃制品的制造或热加 > 其他 > 玻璃的热加工设备 > 连续式玻璃热弯炉
Shared HS6847529
China MFN rate (reference)8
Schedule version2026

US HTS candidates (1)

US HTSDescriptionGeneral (MFN)Total from China
8475.29.00.00 Other Free 50%

Total = MFN base + Section 301 / IEEPA / reciprocal overlays active for China origin. AD/CVD not included.

Frequently asked questions

Which US HTS code corresponds to China HS 8475.2911?

There is no one-to-one mapping: only the first six digits (HS6 847529) are shared internationally. Under this anchor the US schedule has 1 candidate line; the most common is 8475.29.00.00. Match your product facts (material, use, construction) against the descriptions to pick the right one.

How much is US import duty for "连续式玻璃热弯炉" from China?

Using the leading candidate 8475.29.00.00, the total rate from China is about 50% — MFN base plus the Chapter 99 overlays (Section 301 / IEEPA / reciprocal) active for China origin. Other candidates may differ, so verify classification first.

Why is China HS8 not identical to US HTS8?

The WCO Harmonized System is only agreed to six digits. China extends HS6 to 8/10-digit national lines for its own tariffs and statistics, and the US does the same with HTS8/HTS10 — the extensions are independent, so codes must be bridged via HS6.

How do I confirm the final HTS classification?

Compare the US line descriptions against your product facts, check CBP rulings for similar goods, and when in doubt request a binding ruling. The bridge tool lets you re-run this query and compare all candidates side by side.