Skip to main content

China HS → US HTS

China HS 7613.0010 (零售包装用): US HTS candidates & duty rates

China tariff line for "零售包装用" shares the international HS6 anchor 761300 with 1 US HTS candidate below. Compare descriptions, then calculate landed duty.

Updated

Quick answer

China HS 7613.0010 most commonly maps to US HTS 7613.00.00.00. Total duty rate from China (MFN + Chapter 99 overlays): about 30%. Verify the description before filing.

China tariff line facts

China HS line7613.0010
Description零售包装用
Category path装压缩气体或液化气体用的铝制 容器 > 零售包装用
Shared HS6761300
China MFN rate (reference)9
Schedule version2026

US HTS candidates (1)

US HTSDescriptionGeneral (MFN)Total from China
7613.00.00.00 Aluminum containers for compressed or liquefied gas 5% 30%

Total = MFN base + Section 301 / IEEPA / reciprocal overlays active for China origin. AD/CVD not included.

Frequently asked questions

Which US HTS code corresponds to China HS 7613.0010?

There is no one-to-one mapping: only the first six digits (HS6 761300) are shared internationally. Under this anchor the US schedule has 1 candidate line; the most common is 7613.00.00.00. Match your product facts (material, use, construction) against the descriptions to pick the right one.

How much is US import duty for "零售包装用" from China?

Using the leading candidate 7613.00.00.00, the total rate from China is about 30% — MFN base plus the Chapter 99 overlays (Section 301 / IEEPA / reciprocal) active for China origin. Other candidates may differ, so verify classification first.

Why is China HS8 not identical to US HTS8?

The WCO Harmonized System is only agreed to six digits. China extends HS6 to 8/10-digit national lines for its own tariffs and statistics, and the US does the same with HTS8/HTS10 — the extensions are independent, so codes must be bridged via HS6.

How do I confirm the final HTS classification?

Compare the US line descriptions against your product facts, check CBP rulings for similar goods, and when in doubt request a binding ruling. The bridge tool lets you re-run this query and compare all candidates side by side.