Skip to main content

China HS → US HTS

China HS 5105.2900 (其他): US HTS candidates & duty rates

China tariff line for "其他" shares the international HS6 anchor 510529 with 1 US HTS candidate below. Compare descriptions, then calculate landed duty.

Updated

Quick answer

China HS 5105.2900 most commonly maps to US HTS 5105.29.00.00. Total duty rate from China (MFN + Chapter 99 overlays): about 28.10%. Verify the description before filing.

China tariff line facts

China HS line5105.2900
Description其他
Category path已梳的羊毛及动物细毛或粗毛 (包括精梳片毛) > 羊毛条及其他精梳羊毛 > 其他
Shared HS6510529
China MFN rate (reference)0 港HK,澳门MO ⑥ 新西兰NZ
Schedule version2026

US HTS candidates (1)

US HTSDescriptionGeneral (MFN)Total from China
5105.29.00.00 Other (400) 3.9¢/kg + 3.1% 28.10%

Total = MFN base + Section 301 / IEEPA / reciprocal overlays active for China origin. AD/CVD not included.

Frequently asked questions

Which US HTS code corresponds to China HS 5105.2900?

There is no one-to-one mapping: only the first six digits (HS6 510529) are shared internationally. Under this anchor the US schedule has 1 candidate line; the most common is 5105.29.00.00. Match your product facts (material, use, construction) against the descriptions to pick the right one.

How much is US import duty for "其他" from China?

Using the leading candidate 5105.29.00.00, the total rate from China is about 28.10% — MFN base plus the Chapter 99 overlays (Section 301 / IEEPA / reciprocal) active for China origin. Other candidates may differ, so verify classification first.

Why is China HS8 not identical to US HTS8?

The WCO Harmonized System is only agreed to six digits. China extends HS6 to 8/10-digit national lines for its own tariffs and statistics, and the US does the same with HTS8/HTS10 — the extensions are independent, so codes must be bridged via HS6.

How do I confirm the final HTS classification?

Compare the US line descriptions against your product facts, check CBP rulings for similar goods, and when in doubt request a binding ruling. The bridge tool lets you re-run this query and compare all candidates side by side.