Skip to main content

China HS → US HTS

China HS 4402.2000 (果壳的或果核的): US HTS candidates & duty rates

China tariff line for "果壳的或果核的" shares the international HS6 anchor 440220 with 1 US HTS candidate below. Compare descriptions, then calculate landed duty.

Updated

Quick answer

China HS 4402.2000 most commonly maps to US HTS 4402.20.00.00. Total duty rate from China (MFN + Chapter 99 overlays): about 25%. Verify the description before filing.

China tariff line facts

China HS line4402.2000
Description果壳的或果核的
Category path木炭(包括果壳炭及果核炭),不 论是否结块 > 果壳的或果核的
Shared HS6440220
China MFN rate (reference)6∆0
Schedule version2026

US HTS candidates (1)

US HTSDescriptionGeneral (MFN)Total from China
4402.20.00.00 Of shell or nut Free 25%

Total = MFN base + Section 301 / IEEPA / reciprocal overlays active for China origin. AD/CVD not included.

Frequently asked questions

Which US HTS code corresponds to China HS 4402.2000?

There is no one-to-one mapping: only the first six digits (HS6 440220) are shared internationally. Under this anchor the US schedule has 1 candidate line; the most common is 4402.20.00.00. Match your product facts (material, use, construction) against the descriptions to pick the right one.

How much is US import duty for "果壳的或果核的" from China?

Using the leading candidate 4402.20.00.00, the total rate from China is about 25% — MFN base plus the Chapter 99 overlays (Section 301 / IEEPA / reciprocal) active for China origin. Other candidates may differ, so verify classification first.

Why is China HS8 not identical to US HTS8?

The WCO Harmonized System is only agreed to six digits. China extends HS6 to 8/10-digit national lines for its own tariffs and statistics, and the US does the same with HTS8/HTS10 — the extensions are independent, so codes must be bridged via HS6.

How do I confirm the final HTS classification?

Compare the US line descriptions against your product facts, check CBP rulings for similar goods, and when in doubt request a binding ruling. The bridge tool lets you re-run this query and compare all candidates side by side.