China HS → US HTS
China HS 2908.1910 (对氯苯酚): US HTS candidates & duty rates
China tariff line for "对氯苯酚" shares the international HS6 anchor 290819 with 8 US HTS candidates below. Compare descriptions, then calculate landed duty.
Updated
China HS 2908.1910 most commonly maps to US HTS 2908.19.05.00. Total duty rate from China (MFN + Chapter 99 overlays): about 25%. Verify the description before filing.
China tariff line facts
| China HS line | 2908.1910 |
|---|---|
| Description | 对氯苯酚 |
| Category path | 酚及酚醇的卤化、磺化、硝化或 亚硝化衍生物 > 仅含卤素取代基的衍生物及其 > 其他 > 对氯苯酚 |
| Shared HS6 | 290819 |
| China MFN rate (reference) | 4 |
| Schedule version | 2026 |
US HTS candidates (8)
| US HTS | Description | General (MFN) | Total from China |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2908.19.05.00 | 2,2-Bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro- propane | Free | 25% |
| 2908.19.10.00 | 6-Chloro-m-cresol [OH=1];m-Chlorophenol; and Chlorothymol | 5.5% | 30.50% |
| 2908.19.15.00 | 3-Hydroxy-α,α,α-trifluorotoluene | 5.5% | 5.50% |
| 2908.19.20.00 | Salts of pentachlorophenol; and 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol and its salts | 5.5% | 30.50% |
| 2908.19.25.00 | Tetrabromobisphenol A | 5.5% | 30.50% |
| 2908.19.35.00 | Products described in additional U.S. note 3 to section VI | 5.5% | 30.50% |
| 2908.19.60.00 | Other | 5.5% | 30.50% |
| 2908.19 | Other: | — | — |
Total = MFN base + Section 301 / IEEPA / reciprocal overlays active for China origin. AD/CVD not included.
Frequently asked questions
Which US HTS code corresponds to China HS 2908.1910?
There is no one-to-one mapping: only the first six digits (HS6 290819) are shared internationally. Under this anchor the US schedule has 8 candidate lines; the most common is 2908.19.05.00. Match your product facts (material, use, construction) against the descriptions to pick the right one.
How much is US import duty for "对氯苯酚" from China?
Using the leading candidate 2908.19.05.00, the total rate from China is about 25% — MFN base plus the Chapter 99 overlays (Section 301 / IEEPA / reciprocal) active for China origin. Other candidates may differ, so verify classification first.
Why is China HS8 not identical to US HTS8?
The WCO Harmonized System is only agreed to six digits. China extends HS6 to 8/10-digit national lines for its own tariffs and statistics, and the US does the same with HTS8/HTS10 — the extensions are independent, so codes must be bridged via HS6.
How do I confirm the final HTS classification?
Compare the US line descriptions against your product facts, check CBP rulings for similar goods, and when in doubt request a binding ruling. The bridge tool lets you re-run this query and compare all candidates side by side.